English B1: used to, would, and be used to — three things that look alike
Used to walk, would walk, and be used to walking are not variations of one structure. Two describe the past, one describes a state, and mixing them is one of the most common B1 errors.
These three look like a family. They are not.
The first two are past habits. The third is about being accustomed to something, and it can be past, present or future. The trap is the word used, which is doing a different job in each.
The "and not any more" is built in. That is the whole point of the structure — you are marking a contrast with now.
Negative and question: didn't use to, did you use to. The d moves to did and disappears from use.
would is warmer — it belongs to storytelling and reminiscence. But it has a hard restriction:
would cannot describe a state. Only repeated actions.
Have, be, know, like, own, believe are states. With those, only used to works. This single restriction is what most B1 errors come down to.
Because of that, a story usually opens with used to to set the scene and continues with would:
This is a completely different structure: the verb is be, and used to means "familiar with".
Two things to hold on to:
- It takes a noun or -ing, never a bare infinitive. I'm used to get up early ✗ → I'm used to getting up early ✓.
- It changes tense, because be is a real verb: I was used to, I'll be used to, I've never been used to.
get used to is the process; be used to is the finished state.
Ask: is this about the past, or about being accustomed?
| Sentence | Which |
|---|---|
| I ___ live in Madrid. (not now) | used to live |
| Every winter we ___ go skiing. | would go / used to go |
| I ___ the cold now. | am used to |
| He ___ have long hair. | used to have (state — no would) |
| She'll ___ the new system soon. | get used to |
I am used to smoke — this says you're accustomed to a cigarette-like object. You mean I used to smoke.
I would have a bike when I was young — state verb. I used to have a bike.
I didn't used to — the past is already in did. I didn't use to.
Originally published on dev.to